
Ungar Homework for February 24
Ryan McLaughlin
English 110
Misconception #1 A Liberal-arts degree is a luxury that most families can no longer afford.
The first misconception in the Ungar article is a Liberal-arts degree is a luxury that most families can no longer afford. This is a pretty easy misconception due to the fact that most colleges are already super expensive to go to. Most Liberal arts education are part of colleges and have liberal arts courses and majors. The article says, “The future demands of citizenship will require not narrow technical or job-focused training, but rather a subtle understanding of the complex influences that shape the world we live in.” Liberal education prepares students for the real world and teaches them valuable skills. They don’t focus on technical or job-focused training, but rather an understanding of the issues that shape the world we live in.
Misconception #2 College graduates and finding it harder to get jobs with a liberal arts degree.
In the Ungar article the second misconception is that College graduates find it harder to get jobs with a liberal arts degree, however this is proven to be wrong. They do bring up the point about, “Who wants to hire somebody with an irrelevant major like philosophy or French?” Almost everywhere would turn them down but, “A 2009 survey for the Association of American Colleges and Universities actually found that more than three-quarters of our nation’s employers recommend that college bound students pursue a “liberal education.” ” An added 89% of employers also said that they were looking for more emphasis on “the ability to effectively communicate orally and in writing,” and urged college students to develop better “critical thinking and analytical reasoning skills.” The Schuer article also talks about the benefits of having critical thinking. One of Schuer’s main parts is critical thinking and how the liberal arts can teach you it and the values of being a contributing citizen and person.
HW Feb 10
- The authors define (and italicize) the terms microaggressions and trigger warnings and offer a set of examples they think “border on the surreal.” They draw a distinction between what they term “political correctness” of the 1980s and 1990s and what they think is happening today. What, on their view, is that difference and why does it matter for education? What do you make of their ideas in the first section of the article? Be sure to quote from the text in your response. I think that we do need to watch what we say in front of people but also that people do need to have a little bit more of a spine. Teachers shouldn’t fear teaching their students and having to fear what they are saying during their classes. They even talked about how famous comedians won’t go to college campuses anymore because they said, ” Some people can’t take a joke.”
- Consider the second section of the article, “How Did We Get Here?” The authors offer a kind of historical/social diagnosis for what they see on campuses. Attempt a brief (2-3 sentence) summary of the section and draw a text-to-self connection to a specific passage (quote). You might agree or disagree with them in your connection – or both, if it seems appropriate. In this section of the article they talked about what got us to this point and start off by saying it probably comes from generation shifts. They give examples of other things that have changed for each generation and explain how this may be connected to it. Culture has changed alot and has impacted people especially in this way.
- How might Dweck’s ideas about a “fixed mindset” (or a “growth mindset” if you prefer) relate to ideas in the first three sections of “The Coddling…”? In your response, be sure to quote from both texts and EXPLAIN the relationship you see. I think the coddling shows people using a combination of growth and fixed mindset. I understand that things are changing and the world isn’t black and white and if people can understand that then they show growth mindset. However if people are getting offended by insignificant things someone says then that demonstrates a fixed mindset. People can be harsh in the real world and if they don’t learn to deal with and ignore it then they won’t succeed in life.
HW February 3
In the Dweck video She talks about what growth and fixed mindset is. She then goes on to tell about how a growth mindset is beneficial for a young student and how a negative mindset isn’t good to have.
In the Lukianoff/Haidt article they talk about how times have changed and people have to be more careful what they say due to microaggressions. They then proceed to talk about how we got to this point and how people have changed due to modern times.
I think that they both have the right idea with what they are trying to say. I agree that having a fixed mindset will hinder you in the future and that microaggressions are a part of a fixed mindset.



